1\/ If you don\u2019t communicate, you won\u2019t get good<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
As I was prepping for a recent match with my partner, he told me that he didn\u2019t like to talk while playing. It would put him off, he said, to hear me speaking while he\u2019s hitting. This statement told me that we were bound to have a rather difficult \u2014 if not frosty \u2014 experience on the court. I tried to suggest that telling him what the opposition was doing when he was dealing with a lob or had his back turned, would be helpful for him<\/em>. It\u2019s about allowing him to focus on the ball and give him insight as to where and how he might hit the ball back. For me, it\u2019s an act of partnership. For him, it was a distraction. Obviously, he was not about to start telling me what the opposition was doing was when I was handling the lob or had my back to the net. In such circumstances, we were not only not<\/em> helping one another, we were just two independent individuals* playing the ball as we saw it individually. That is no recipe for getting good. It was certainly no recipe for performing well together. We were properly thrashed. If you don\u2019t communicate, you won\u2019t get good. At the end of the match, sadly my partner wasn\u2019t able to look me in the eye.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cCommunication is at least as important as, if not more important than the technical aspects of the game.\u201d Talking during a game, in between points for example, can irritate. I get that. I would point out that, more frequently, it is more irritating for the opposition. \u201cWhat are they talking about?\u201d or \u201cWhy are they wasting time?\u201d they might ask themselves. But talking during the point and, especially, between points is about connecting with your partner. This can start with your partner signalling to you behind his back in which direction to serve (i.e. line, body or glass). Then you need to iron what calls you want to have when you\u2019re striking the ball. Of course, there\u2019s also the classic: mine\/yours (to decide who\u2019s to hit the ball). And then between points, there\u2019s a chance to evaluate what happened in the last point. What did we do well or wrong? What needs improvement? What are the opposition up to? Should we change any tactics? Because there\u2019s a time limit (20 seconds) as to how long you spend between points, you need to think of these quick exchanges as part of a longer conversation. And, when it\u2019s time to change sides, you can spend a full 90 seconds (per the regulations of the tournament), developing the conversation. That can include collecting yourself and\/or taking a step back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In another game I played where my partner got overwhelmed with the idea<\/em> of talking, so we just shut down all communication. This situation highlights my own<\/em> opportunity for growth and improvement. Before the game began, I started to engage in the conversation around on-court communication. Upon giving my \u201cspiel,\u201d with my routine of calling devices, I saw that my partner\u2019s eyes started to glaze over. I had gone from zero to too much. My lesson learned was to be more empathic with my partner\u2019s status and context. In this instance, my partner was not communicative in the first place. I should have known better than to go too much, too fast. He became deadset with \u201cjust getting on with it,\u201d with the implicit understanding that communication on the court was not to happen. Just because we\u2019re two capable athletes will not beat even a lesser team that works better as a team. We inevitably ended up with mixed wires, (avoidably) terrible shot-making and a complete lack of solidarity. That was clearly not beneficial for team spirit. But there\u2019s another absolutely vital point to calling out what the opposition is doing while your partner is preparing to strike an overhead. While your partner is eyeing the ball floating above, your<\/em> role is to keep your eyes on the opposing pair\u2019s movements. You call out what you see them doing and trust your partner to do what\u2019s best in the moment<\/strong>. In some cases, for the more well-oiled teams, there are set strokes and sequences that are pre-decided. In these moments, you are not watching to see what your partner is doing. You are relying on him\/her to do as best as possible. You\u2019re certainly not looking to see if\/how they will screw it up! If they do miss, your role is to keep the bond, to continue to encourage. Upwards and onwards. Remember, you may well screw up next time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \uf0e8 Communication is at the heart of building trust in a team.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n In a sport that is ALL about joy, you\u2019d have thought that talking is part of the enjoyment. If your gig is all about winning, then communication ought to be right up there with the technicity of your shots. I have a bunch of friends for whom communication is only through banter. That\u2019s fine to the extent we\u2019re only interested in having a good time (as a foursome) and not actually worried about progressing. Sometimes such banter is jolly. Other times, it\u2019s a bit borderline. But that\u2019s part of their<\/em> style of personality. Banter is surely better than silence. But for those wishing to have fun and perform, it\u2019s better yet to figure out how to help one another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Herewith are my calling devices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For starters, there\u2019s the call that the ball is mine<\/em> or yours<\/em>. This is all the more important when you are different handed (i.e. left- and right-handed). The left-handed player typically should be playing on the right to keep the forehands down the middle for both players. That\u2019s because the bulk of shots are played through the central thrust of the court (where the position of both players at the net represents the boundaries of that central thoroughfare). Perhaps I over call, but I like to make it as clear as possible when the ball is my partner\u2019s, even when it\u2019s pretty obvious. That\u2019s because I consider communication an ongoing process. Such calls fluidify the connection between the players.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A second concept of communicating during the point is, when serving, sharing the direction of the first serve. Like in lawn tennis doubles, I like to give the net partner the choice for the first<\/em> serve (down the line, at the body, or at the glass). Remember that a double fault gets a demerit in the form of having to pick up the tab at the bar after the match. So, for Pete\u2019s sake, just get the second ball in. Another moment to exchange, although more challenging to execute, is about the return of service. I like to talk about this with my partner especially when we, as a team, aren\u2019t winning points off their serve. Secondly, on the big points, when I\u2019m to return, I might volunteer to my partner what I plan to do if I get the opportunity. It may not pan out, but at least I\u2019m sharing my intention and hopefully creating a form of trust with my partner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Finally, and most importantly, when I\u2019m handling an overhead or headed back to retrieve a lob off the back wall, I very much want my partner to indicate what the opposition is doing. Naturally, it\u2019s important to have simple instructions, one word barked out in advance as much as possible. Here are my suggested quick calls:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Of course, once you have made a call, the opponents might decide to move, so the calling must stay up to date as best as possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If one is coming up and the other is staying back, the call should be to identify who is coming up. One way you can do this, if you know the names, is just to call out the name of the one up at the net. That\u2019s typically the one you want to avoid, unless you plan to go at that player with a particular shot at their feet or at their body. Another method is to label the players directly in front of you as mine<\/em> or yours<\/em>. As far as I\u2019m concerned, at my level, I\u2019m most keen to know if my diagonal opponent is up or not, since that\u2019s my go-to direction. As a pair builds its identity, there are other calls or instructions that can be included.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I recommend going through these calling conventions well before the game, particularly if you\u2019ve never played together before. You obviously want to pre-agree on how you\u2019re going to call. When the game gets under way, you can discuss between points on how the calling is going. What do you need from one another? How are the opponents reacting. How are the sequences going?<\/p>\n\n\n\n What are your challenges when communicating in a padel match? What calling devices do you use? Anything you take issue you? Please drop in your comment below!<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2014\u2014\u2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n *It was almost disheartening to hear the legendary Sanyo Gutierrez, <\/strong>current world number 10, say that he considers padel tennis<\/a> an individualistic sport. In an interview with him after Paquito Navarro left him to join Juan Lebr\u00f3n, Sanyo shrugged it off saying how each player is out for themselves. Of course, that\u2019s how it may<\/em> play out, but that\u2019s not the mindset I\u2019d want on my side. Like in life (marriage) or in a business venture (entrepreneurship), it\u2019s radically important for long-term success to have a shared<\/strong> ambition that is coupled with (some) shared values.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This article was first published here<\/a> on MinterDial.com.<\/p>\n[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column]\n\t\t\t[\/et_pb_row]\n\t\t[\/et_pb_section]\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Communication is the lifeblood of any organization, including a pair of padel players in doubles. It’s essential for fostering trust and driving performance on the court. Without effective communication, players won’t improve or connect with their partners. Talking during a game helps build solidarity between teammates. Key communication strategies include calling “mine\/yours” to decide who hits the ball, signaling serve direction, and providing information about opponents’ positions during overhead shots. Establishing clear calling conventions before the game and discussing them between points is crucial. While some players may find excessive talking distracting, finding the right balance of communication is vital for success and enjoyment in padel.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1230,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"\n We, at the Joy of Padel, are fascinated by the parallels \/ extrapolations one can make from the padel court to life in general or at the workplace. At the pinnacle is the notion of communication. Communication is the lifeblood of any organisation (including a pair of padel players playing doubles). Communication, at a higher and entirely critical level, is the solder of any relationship. Communication is that which binds us, allows us to learn, build and protect us. It is the essential ingredient for fostering collective intelligence. And at a more prosaic level, it\u2019s that which drives performance and unity on a padel court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I read recently the book by Sarah Rozenthuler, \u201cNow We\u2019re Talking<\/a>,\u201d published by Pearson. It was a great reminder of the importance of being able to engage in meaningful discussion \u2014 or dialogue<\/em> as she stresses. I should qualify that the sport of padel is not profound. It\u2019s really more about joy and exercise. One should not expect to discuss Voltaire, Cicero or Esther Perrel (who\u2019s that you ask?) with your fellow padelers. Yet, the conversation around communication can quickly become more existential. And there are some important life lessons that can be extracted from how you play and interact with your partner and opponents. Sparked by a couple of situations I\u2019ve experienced over the last few weeks, I feel the urge to insist on the need for better communication on the padel court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As I was prepping for a recent match with my partner, he told me that he didn\u2019t like to talk while playing. It would put him off, he said, to hear me speaking while he\u2019s hitting. This statement told me that we were bound to have a rather difficult \u2014 if not frosty \u2014 experience on the court. I tried to suggest that telling him what the opposition was doing when he was dealing with a lob or had his back turned, would be helpful for him<\/em>. It\u2019s about allowing him to focus on the ball and give him insight as to where and how he might hit the ball back. For me, it\u2019s an act of partnership. For him, it was a distraction. Obviously, he was not about to start telling me what the opposition was doing was when I was handling the lob or had my back to the net. In such circumstances, we were not only not<\/em> helping one another, we were just two independent individuals* playing the ball as we saw it individually. That is no recipe for getting good. It was certainly no recipe for performing well together. We were properly thrashed. If you don\u2019t communicate, you won\u2019t get good. At the end of the match, sadly my partner wasn\u2019t able to look me in the eye.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cCommunication is at least as important as, if not more important than the technical aspects of the game.\u201d Talking during a game, in between points for example, can irritate. I get that. I would point out that, more frequently, it is more irritating for the opposition. \u201cWhat are they talking about?\u201d or \u201cWhy are they wasting time?\u201d they might ask themselves. But talking during the point and, especially, between points is about connecting with your partner. This can start with your partner signalling to you behind his back in which direction to serve (i.e. line, body or glass). Then you need to iron what calls you want to have when you\u2019re striking the ball. Of course, there\u2019s also the classic: mine\/yours (to decide who\u2019s to hit the ball). And then between points, there\u2019s a chance to evaluate what happened in the last point. What did we do well or wrong? What needs improvement? What are the opposition up to? Should we change any tactics? Because there\u2019s a time limit (20 seconds) as to how long you spend between points, you need to think of these quick exchanges as part of a longer conversation. And, when it\u2019s time to change sides, you can spend a full 90 seconds (per the regulations of the tournament), developing the conversation. That can include collecting yourself and\/or taking a step back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In another game I played where my partner got overwhelmed with the idea<\/em> of talking, so we just shut down all communication. This situation highlights my own<\/em> opportunity for growth and improvement. Before the game began, I started to engage in the conversation around on-court communication. Upon giving my \u201cspiel,\u201d with my routine of calling devices, I saw that my partner\u2019s eyes started to glaze over. I had gone from zero to too much. My lesson learned was to be more empathic with my partner\u2019s status and context. In this instance, my partner was not communicative in the first place. I should have known better than to go too much, too fast. He became deadset with \u201cjust getting on with it,\u201d with the implicit understanding that communication on the court was not to happen. Just because we\u2019re two capable athletes will not beat even a lesser team that works better as a team. We inevitably ended up with mixed wires, (avoidably) terrible shot-making and a complete lack of solidarity. That was clearly not beneficial for team spirit. But there\u2019s another absolutely vital point to calling out what the opposition is doing while your partner is preparing to strike an overhead. While your partner is eyeing the ball floating above, your<\/em> role is to keep your eyes on the opposing pair\u2019s movements. You call out what you see them doing and trust your partner to do what\u2019s best in the moment<\/strong>. In some cases, for the more well-oiled teams, there are set strokes and sequences that are pre-decided. In these moments, you are not watching to see what your partner is doing. You are relying on him\/her to do as best as possible. You\u2019re certainly not looking to see if\/how they will screw it up! If they do miss, your role is to keep the bond, to continue to encourage. Upwards and onwards. Remember, you may well screw up next time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \uf0e8 Communication is at the heart of building trust in a team.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n In a sport that is ALL about joy, you\u2019d have thought that talking is part of the enjoyment. If your gig is all about winning, then communication ought to be right up there with the technicity of your shots. I have a bunch of friends for whom communication is only through banter. That\u2019s fine to the extent we\u2019re only interested in having a good time (as a foursome) and not actually worried about progressing. Sometimes such banter is jolly. Other times, it\u2019s a bit borderline. But that\u2019s part of their<\/em> style of personality. Banter is surely better than silence. But for those wishing to have fun and perform, it\u2019s better yet to figure out how to help one another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Herewith are my calling devices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For starters, there\u2019s the call that the ball is mine<\/em> or yours<\/em>. This is all the more important when you are different handed (i.e. left- and right-handed). The left-handed player typically should be playing on the right to keep the forehands down the middle for both players. That\u2019s because the bulk of shots are played through the central thrust of the court (where the position of both players at the net represents the boundaries of that central thoroughfare). Perhaps I over call, but I like to make it as clear as possible when the ball is my partner\u2019s, even when it\u2019s pretty obvious. That\u2019s because I consider communication an ongoing process. Such calls fluidify the connection between the players.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A second concept of communicating during the point is, when serving, sharing the direction of the first serve. Like in lawn tennis doubles, I like to give the net partner the choice for the first<\/em> serve (down the line, at the body, or at the glass). Remember that a double fault gets a demerit in the form of having to pick up the tab at the bar after the match. So, for Pete\u2019s sake, just get the second ball in. Another moment to exchange, although more challenging to execute, is about the return of service. I like to talk about this with my partner especially when we, as a team, aren\u2019t winning points off their serve. Secondly, on the big points, when I\u2019m to return, I might volunteer to my partner what I plan to do if I get the opportunity. It may not pan out, but at least I\u2019m sharing my intention and hopefully creating a form of trust with my partner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Finally, and most importantly, when I\u2019m handling an overhead or headed back to retrieve a lob off the back wall, I very much want my partner to indicate what the opposition is doing. Naturally, it\u2019s important to have simple instructions, one word barked out in advance as much as possible. Here are my suggested quick calls:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Of course, once you have made a call, the opponents might decide to move, so the calling must stay up to date as best as possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If one is coming up and the other is staying back, the call should be to identify who is coming up. One way you can do this, if you know the names, is just to call out the name of the one up at the net. That\u2019s typically the one you want to avoid, unless you plan to go at that player with a particular shot at their feet or at their body. Another method is to label the players directly in front of you as mine<\/em> or yours<\/em>. As far as I\u2019m concerned, at my level, I\u2019m most keen to know if my diagonal opponent is up or not, since that\u2019s my go-to direction. As a pair builds its identity, there are other calls or instructions that can be included.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I recommend going through these calling conventions well before the game, particularly if you\u2019ve never played together before. You obviously want to pre-agree on how you\u2019re going to call. When the game gets under way, you can discuss between points on how the calling is going. What do you need from one another? How are the opponents reacting. How are the sequences going?<\/p>\n\n\n\n What are your challenges when communicating in a padel match? What calling devices do you use? Anything you take issue you? Please drop in your comment below!<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2014\u2014\u2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n *It was almost disheartening to hear the legendary Sanyo Gutierrez, <\/strong>current world number 10, say that he considers padel tennis<\/a> an individualistic sport. In an interview with him after Paquito Navarro left him to join Juan Lebr\u00f3n, Sanyo shrugged it off saying how each player is out for themselves. Of course, that\u2019s how it may<\/em> play out, but that\u2019s not the mindset I\u2019d want on my side. Like in life (marriage) or in a business venture (entrepreneurship), it\u2019s radically important for long-term success to have a shared<\/strong> ambition that is coupled with (some) shared values.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
\u2013Nikhil Mohindra<\/strong>, GB Men\u2019s Team #4<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n2\/ If you don\u2019t communicate, you don\u2019t connect<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
3\/ If you don\u2019t communicate, you\u2019re not building trust<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
4\/ Finally, if you don\u2019t communicate, you\u2019re killing the joy<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
My own communication \u201cinstruction kit\u201d goes as follows\u2026<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
1\/ Mine \/ yours<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.minterdial.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Communication-Instructions-Protocol-300x169.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n2\/ On serve<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
3\/ Back, up, tight or coming<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
Prepare to communicate better\u2026<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
1\/ If you don\u2019t communicate, you won\u2019t get good<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
\u2013Nikhil Mohindra<\/strong>, GB Men\u2019s Team #4<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n2\/ If you don\u2019t communicate, you don\u2019t connect<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
3\/ If you don\u2019t communicate, you\u2019re not building trust<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
4\/ Finally, if you don\u2019t communicate, you\u2019re killing the joy<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
My own communication \u201cinstruction kit\u201d goes as follows\u2026<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
1\/ Mine \/ yours<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n2\/ On serve<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
3\/ Back, up, tight or coming<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
Prepare to communicate better\u2026<\/h3>\n\n\n\n